User talk:Ignaciocobogonzalez

Nomination of Brad Wilkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brad Wilkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brad Wilkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Mike for letting me know! I will go take a look. tx Ignaciocobogonzalez (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

References needed
Hello, I suggest that you read our notability guideline for people. Also read what qualifies as a reliable source. If you find sources establishing notability for this architect, add them to the article and let people know at the deletion debate. Cullen328 (talk) 16:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Ignaciocobogonzalez (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Ignaciocobogonzalez for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PearlRiverTower.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PearlRiverTower.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.bradwilkins.com/news/front11.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:MichaelWilkins.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MichaelWilkins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)