User talk:Igor Martyniuk

September 2017
Hello, I'm Dammitkevin. I noticed that you recently removed content from Serhiy Taruta without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dammitkevin (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Igor Martyniuk, why do you keep removing the statement that Serhiy Taruta is an oligarch? — benzband  ( talk ) 14:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! I tried to explain this to you on your page. The oligarch is a person who has a lot of capital, the origin of which is difficult to clarify, owns a media business and directly or indirectly affects the current government. Information, which said that this man - an oligarch in open sources is missing. Therefore, I consider this "title" to be erroneous in the application to the hero of the article (The term "business oligarch"[1] is almost a synonym of the term "business magnate" from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_oligarch) in the list of Ukrainian oligarchs Taruta is absent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_oligarchs Thank you


 * I see you posted to Dammitkevin's talk page (which is not my page, and I am not User:Dammitkevin), claiming to have studied the sources and come to the conclusion they are incorrect. That is your own analysis. The article cannot state Taruta is "mistakenly named", unless there is a source which says that he is mistakenly named (by such and such).
 * On the other hand, we have The Guardian, The Financial Times and VICE for instance describing Taruta as an oligarch. Let's also note that he acquired wealth in a post-Soviet state in the 1990s and is part of a small group holding power in a state.
 * Additionally the fact that Taruta doesn't appear on the page Ukrainian oligarchs isn't an indicator. The section in that page only lists what it calls "notable oligarchs", and not necessary exhaustively.
 * Finally, as Dammitkevin said to you, you can take the issue to the talk page to discuss instead of simply removing stuff. — benzband  ( talk ) 15:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Okay! Only for the purity of this discussion, please, how do you feel about the fact that, for example, in an article about Russian oligarchs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_oligarh there is (random choice) Vladimir Potanin, but on the page https: // en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Potanin we see "is a Russian billionaire and entrepreneur". Where is the standard? Why are you so insistent on this word. There are also different opinions from different respected sources. Thank you


 * If you scrolled through it, the Vladimir Potanin article did link to the Russian oligarchs article. However I've now made it clearer with an edit adding the term to the lead (with a reference).
 * As a side note, I wouldn't call Taruta "the hero of the article", he's the subject.
 * Cheers — benzband  ( talk ) 17:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of StrategEast Westernization Index 2018


A tag has been placed on StrategEast Westernization Index 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://strategeast.org/strategeast-westernization-index-2018/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with StrategEast Westernization Index 2018. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Igor Martyniuk. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but StrategEast Westernization Index 2018 has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Identifying blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD give the appearance of an editor violating Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read FAQ/Organizations.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.


 * There is more information at Community portal. There is help available at THE TEAHOUSE. Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Igor Martyniuk. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. I'm sorry, but StrategEast Westernization Index 2018 has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Wikipedia is the world's largest free content encyclopedia. As such, it cannot contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content must be completely rewritten and reformatted from scratch. Content published elsewhere copied into Wikipedia must state that it is public domain, licensed under the GFDL, or a creative commons license. Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of StrategEast Westernization Index


The article StrategEast Westernization Index has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable index, no major coverage in media"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Renata (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of StrategEast Westernization Index for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StrategEast Westernization Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/StrategEast Westernization Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Renata (talk) 03:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)