User talk:Igor~enwiki

srbine, prošlo je vrijeme tvoga prosrbskog jednoumlja i propagande po wikipediji. Od sad &#269;e se pisati istina po ovim stranicama.

ZDS!

--GeneralPatton 10:40, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * Šic, kaj ti je to ZDS, za de&#269;ki spremni? ;) Nau&#269;i prvo razliku izme&#273;u &#269; i &#263; pre nego što se po&#269;neš igrati sa velikima. Piše se prosrpskog ina&#269;e... Jadu i bedo! Sad &#263;u baš iz inata da idem za tobom i sve ispravljam.


 * Igore, Carla Del Ponte te traži. Ozbiljno, Igore reci mi zašto ovoliko fundamentalisti&#269;ki, radikalno mrziš Hrvate i Bošnjake? To si imao neku osobnu tragediju? Mislim, vjerujem da nije lako biti gubitnik u ratu, roditi se u jednoj od najsiromašnijih zemalja Europe, zemlji koja je ratovala protiv NATA, &#269;ija je vojska po&#269;inila najve&#269;e zlo&#269;ine u Europi poslje nacista, i sve to, no kod tebe mora biti još nešto više, ti se ponašaš kao da misliš da si &#269;ovjek sa misijom. Stvarno je šteta što si ovoliko optere&#269;en. Bog i Hrvati! --GeneralPatton 23:25, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * Nikoga ne mrzim ali to ne zna&#269;i da vam trebam dopustiti da pišete gluposti. Opismeni se. Optere&#263;en a ne optere&#269;en. Kada ve&#263; pretendujete na srpski jezik nau&#269;ite svih 30 slova. - Igor

Thanks very much - also, for the list of monasteries etc burned - where is that information from? Can we attribute the reports? Appreciate it, Mark Richards 00:48, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Serbian Orthodox Church and B92. --Igor

Igor, what is the copyright status of those images of RS banknotes and stamps that you recently uploaded? In my experience, banks very rarely give permission for people to copy their notes. If you've got this permission, could you please add it to the relevant image pages? Unfortunately the images will probably have to be listed as probable copyright violations otherwise. -- ChrisO 01:17, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * I did not know that Banks do not allow for pictures of banknotes to be taken? What about numismatic publications? You are not going to try and convince me that they need to get permission from every single Central Bank in the world? This has nothing to do with counterfitting, notes are not life size.


 * As far as I know, banks almost always prohibit unauthorised reproductions of their notes because of the obvious dangers of counterfeiting. And I think numismatic publications do have to get permission - banknotes are usually copyrighted by their issuers and you have to get special permission to reproduce any aspect of them. See http://213.225.140.30/banknotes/repoappform.htm for an example of how the Bank of England handles this. -- ChrisO 01:32, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Nonsense, numismatic publications catalog currencies of the world, getting permission from every bank would be impossible and just one missing currency (or pictures of them) catastrophic. It might be the case in the UK but not in the rest of the world.


 * This is the official page of the National Bank of Serbia, no such warnings, they don't even place the words SPECIMEN over the banknotes which I will do to get you off my back. http://www.nbs.yu/serbian/7_3.htm --Igor 0:54, 21 Mar 2004 {UTC)


 * It does have copyright notices on the page, though. Please don't think I'm trying to make trouble for you - it's just that if you're actually in Serbia, you could have problems with anti-counterfeiting laws. I certainly would if I uploaded Bank of England notes without permission. -- ChrisO 02:09, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Every single page has a copyright notice on http://www.nbs.yu, that's customary for a website. It has no particular warnings or notices concerning the use of pictures of its banknotes in fact I remember quite clearly newspapers using them to fill their pages as background when it comes to financial stories.


 * I added the words SPECIMEN in red over the images, just so you can get a good night's sleep tonight, seeing how much you worry about them coming after me for counterfitting. --Igor 1:18, 21 Mar 2004 {UTC)


 * Anyways, it must be my lucky day since the Republika Srpska as of 1996 no longer has its Central Bank and thus the issuing authority that allegedly holds the copyright no longer exists, that makes it public domain. Tu?an dan za krelce :). -- Igor


 * Good point! They use the convertible mark now, right?


 * Incidentally, were there ever any RSK notes or did they just use those of the FRY or the RS? -- ChrisO 01:32, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * You will know the answer to that when I get to do the Republic of Serbian Krajina page. -- Igor 0:54, 21 Mar 2004 {UTC)

Igor, could you please add some copyright info to Image:Serbia100Din.jpg? If you have permission to reproduce the note, that should be stated clearly. -- ChrisO 01:52, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Igor! I moved your addition of the name of North Ossetia-Alania in the Ossetic language out of the info box into the article intro. The reason for that is that the info box headers have only the names of the federal subjects in their official languages. Since Ossetic is not an official language of the republic (only Russian is), the name in that language should not be there. Thanks for the great addition, though!--Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 20:36, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)


 * No problem - Igor

Serbs
I see you recently added a lot of population information to Serbs. Do you have any sources for this? If so, could you please cite them? I've found that these sections on population statistics are often very controversial. See Armenians (people) for an example of handling this in a way that I think will stand up to scrutiny. -- Jmabel | Talk 09:01, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

Misuse of minor edits
Igor, please don't mark the deletion of a chunk of text as a "minor edit" (as you did on Greater Serbia). That's an abuse of the minor edits function and is against policy - see Minor edit for more information. -- ChrisO 09:05, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image copyrights
Thanks for uploading Image:Srbinje.jpg and Image:Srpski jezik.gif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,   &mdash; Edwin Stearns | Talk 18:36, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

ALSO:
 * Image:KosovoMetohiaMap.png

Hi Igor, just aying hi!--68.81.205.212 15:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Здраво, Игоре! Потпуно подржавам твоје чланке и податке које износиш на њима. Вјеруј ми, и ја сам искусио како је то кад ти се усташки оријентисани Хрвати мијешају у чланке и бришу и исправљају податке како њима одговара.

Kakve sve gluposti ne će čovjek pročitati kad zna ćirilicu! Obećao sam sâm sebi da se moram skinuti s navučenosti na objašnjavanje, ali kao i svi poroci, i taj je težak. J*biga, slijedi objašnjenje (kratko i jasno da ga tvoj indoktrinirani um shvati). Заправо, истини више одговара да про-четнички "оријентисани" Смрби (или Сврби, овисно о укусу), свјесни да је појам "српска култура" готово оксиморон, покушавају од хрватске културе украсти што се може, а остало дискредитирати. Твој пријатељ Игор један је од оних који нису схватили узалудност тог потхвата. Za kraj, pozdrav na latinici; kad ste nam već ukrali jezik, naučite ga ispravno pisati. P.S. Ako želite pisati o "srpskoj kulturi", posjetite stranicu http://www.srbovanje.com i napasite oči biserima svjetske kulturne baštine.

--193.198.128.139 01:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

What happenned with the Catholic Serbs article??? HolyRomanEmperor 21:32, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Got deleted. Nikola 20:58, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Why and is there a way for me to see it? HolyRomanEmperor 21:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Votes needed: see Montenegrin language talk page. HolyRomanEmperor 12:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello!
Could please help solve the disputes on Mehmed Pasha Sokolović and Ruđer Bošković? --HolyRomanEmperor 20:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Article Improvement Belgrade
You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, -- serbiana -  talk  02:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Serbia100Dinara.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Serbia100Dinara.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Serbia100Dinars.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Serbia100Dinars.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Involvement of Croatian Catholic clergy with the Ustaša regime
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Involvement of Croatian Catholic clergy with the Ustaša regime, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article is a complete mess, and seems by its very framing to invite edit wars. The Wiki articles on the historical realities (Stepinac, clerical fascism, Ustasa etc.) cover all the ground below, and do so better, citing credible sources - as opposed to conspiracist stuff like Avro Manhattan. Seems to me the article is both extremely poor and redundant.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 13afuse (talk) 23:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Igor. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Igor~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)