User talk:Igoththis

Igoththis, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

March 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Salesianum School, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 15:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Salesianum School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. John from Idegon (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Notable alumni sections
Hi. You seem to have a misunderstanding as to what "notable" means on Wikipedia. That isn't too uncommon a problem. In Wikipedia terms, notable simply means "qualifies for an article". The particular qualifications for a biography are at WP:BIO. Note that notability is not a matter of your or my opinion; rather itis a matter of having reliable secondary independent sources. Nothing that the school produces nor anything on a person's own website can possibly show notability. I reverted your edits. Perhaps the best way to show notability is to write the bio first. John from Idegon (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)