User talk:Ihatetoregister

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --TimPope 17:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

nice username
Nice username. I hate the thought of registering, too.

Who wants those template welcome messages, either? Well, here's the real deal. Welcome! --69.165.73.238 15:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks buddy, although I've been around for a while :P --I hate to register 18:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Acer Ferrari Series
Hi

I've nominated 5 articles for deletion, which are the Acer Ferrari series which you created. Wikipedia is not a listing of features of a product, which is why I nominated them.

However, if you could merge all of them together, ie. put all the content of 1000,3000,4000,5000 into the main page Acer Ferrari series, and expand that one, the page would be kept.

Something like celebrity endorsements, something noteworthy about their ad campaigns, anything which would make them deserve an encyclopedia article.

Just dropped by to request you to not take offense as my nominating them for deletion... we all look forward to your contributions! Happy editing!

xCentaur | ☎  07:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Re-added welcome message
Hope you don't mind; usually, if you're going to delete comments from your talk page, you add them to an archive. I was going to welcome you now again, just so you know of the confusion it causes. If you don't like your talk page full, or if you like it clean, archive it, and add links to your archives.

I can see you're just starting to become re-involved, so good luck editing! · AO Talk 22:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --I hate to register 23:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Wörms of prey
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Wörms of prey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 08:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Worldshutyourmouth-dvd.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Worldshutyourmouth-dvd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Littlecars-dvd.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Littlecars-dvd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of KTechlab
A tag has been placed on KTechlab, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 16x9 (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of KTechlab
I have nominated KTechlab, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/KTechlab. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 16x9 (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of FTP commands
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of FTP commands. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of FTP commands. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wwwww
A tag has been placed on Wwwww requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ely1 (talk) 18:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Graph (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graph (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Graph (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Littlecars-dvd.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Littlecars-dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Maya the Bee, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Adding content is never a minor edit. Restoring content that has already been challenged is even less minor. Thank you for adding the new reliable sources, but restoring the source that I had already challenged as being non-reliable was not appropriate. If you think the source is reliable then take it to the talk page..And the Daily Mail is not reliable either. See WP:DAILY MAIL. Meters (talk) 23:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of AutoTRAX DEX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AutoTRAX DEX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AutoTRAX DEX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)