User talk:Ihavenolife

hi any idea what did happen to new utopia ? look like it get sued ? server moved from texas to oklahaoma to florida and the office postadres for new utopia did get moved from oklahoma to florida to uk  and i  found that a website said lazarus long was found guilty of fraud and the owner of the florida server/web adres was bankrupt in florida court (some rumoers that he was invoolded in some e gold bussnis that got closed dowen by police one of the consulates and some other of those that did sig the laws was found guilty for frauds) so did anybody get there money back of the citizens ? or start and new real project like gated comunity in a central amrican state  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.33.187 (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of fictional military organizations
I have nominated List of fictional military organizations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of fictional military organizations&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 17:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cancelled video games for deletion
The article List of cancelled video games is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of cancelled video games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I42 (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Colonel Warden/Fictional military organisations
User:Colonel Warden/Fictional military organisations, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Colonel Warden/Fictional military organisations and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Colonel Warden/Fictional military organisations during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rebecca Brown (Christian author) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Brown (Christian author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rebecca Brown (Christian author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of New Utopia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Utopia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New Utopia & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiraffeBoy (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sudoku-by-L2G-20050715.gif


The file File:Sudoku-by-L2G-20050715.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)