User talk:Iifo12

Welcome
 Hello Iifo12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Iifo12, good luck, and have fun. – Aboutmovies (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danielle Vanzura


The article Danielle Vanzura has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Absolutely nothing about this supposed person in Google news, Google scholar, and Google books, and all sources are vague and offline. Smells like a hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Eppstein (talk) 02:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC) —David Eppstein (talk) 02:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Danielle Vanzura for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danielle Vanzura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danielle Vanzura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Vanzura, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Vanzura with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Recreational mathematics experts with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Jock (athlete), and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Vanzura. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Queueing theory
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Queueing theory. C(u)w(t)C(c) 18:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Help, not hoaxes
Hi there. It appears that you know something about WikiMarkup and HTML. Could you use your skills more constructively from now on? We could really use your help rather than your hoaxes. Bearian (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)