User talk:Ijabz

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Horsforth has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bflickr\.com/(?:photos|groups|search)\b (links: http://www.flickr.com/groups/ls18/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

CVSNT Documentation
I've removed an edit you made to the article CVSNT


 * However, CVSNT is now distributed by March Hare Software and comprehensive documentation is only available as part of the CVS Suite for $152 USD.

This comment is factually innaccurate since no documentation has ever been removed from the CVSNT project (you can verify this by checking the repository history). CVS Suite does contain additional (better written) documentation, but that is nothing new (has been that way for at least 4 years) and other publishers (like O'Reilly) have always published 'better' documentation than open source projects provide. If you wanted to amend the article to list all the 3rd party suppliers that supply extensions/documentation for the article then you can expand the relavent section.

As for the other changes:
 * The author of the software and the license is already clearly in the article as a part of the 'box'.
 * The price of 3rd party products like books should not be a part of the main article.

If you wish to discuss this further please use the discussion page for the main article Talk:CVSNT

Arthur (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jaikoz.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jaikoz.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)(Talk) 21:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, missed this message - bit what do I need to do to stop getting a screenshot deleted. The screenshot is provided by me there are no copyright issues with having a screesnshot of the application itself, as for the issue of it containing coverart in the screenshot, isn't that just fair use. Look all these images used by similar software that also contain artwork in the screenshot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amarok2_1.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Screenshot-AlbumPic.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Picard_090_linux.png

Ijabz (talk) 08:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Jaikoz notability
Please, if you really want this article to stay you must establish it's notability per Wikipedia policy. It's important that you cite reliable second-party sources that establish the importance of this application clearly enough that even a technophobic poet will recognize and admit it. If not, it's possible that this article will be deleted.

I removed the proposed deletion tag and explained my objection to it on the article's Talk page, which I believe will require an open discussion before the article can be deleted, but this is a temporary reprieve. The article's notability has been disputed for over 2 1/2 years now, and all it takes is one slash-and-burn editor to send it to Articles for Deletion for debate and demolition.

Believe me, there's nothing I find more frustrating than to find a topic I'm interested in missing from Wikipedia, and nothing more maddening to discover that it's missing because the Wikipedians themselves have destroyed an existing article, but as a practical matter it's up to you to keep this article out of the path of Wikipedian Vogons. Yappy2bhere (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jaikoz
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jaikoz, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Explodicle (T/C) 17:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You were on a roll with Jaikoz. If you don't want your good work to be lost, now is the time to speak up in its defense at AfD. Yappy2bhere (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albunack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Albunack
Hi,

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I see you just created the article Albunack. When I came across it and looked for reliable sources on the subject, I wasn't able to find any at all. That would typically mean it should be nominated for deletion. Since it's so new, I though I'd leave this message instead for now. How would you feel if I moved it to the "draft" space until which time as you or someone else can find/add reliable sources to establish notability? That would mean it would live at Draft:Albunack. More information on Drafts here: Drafts. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Message order on talk pages
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:MusicBrainz Picard were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 16:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)