User talk:Ijcima/Saisiyat language

Final Review
Hi Isaiah, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar, but would benefit from further proofreading. At times, the language is not encyclopedic (it is speculative, or makes excessive use of agentless passives where such are not justified). 4 points.
 * 2) Structure: The structure is idiosyncratic and does not follow the suggested template. 3 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: There are abundant references to legitimate high-quality sources, even if some of the claims are not justified with a reference. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information presented is relevant. The culture section in particular could benefit from a tighter focus, especially since you're well over the word limit. 4 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 2295/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 5 points.

The final score is 26/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 00:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)