User talk:Ijerusalem

AfD nomination of Islamic Research Academy
I have nominated Islamic Research Academy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Islamic Research Academy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  Chzz  ►  03:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ISRAlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:ISRAlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Al-Aqsa Mosque
Al-Aqsa Mosque seems to be confused by many people for a building, while it refers to an enclave that includes many buildings.


 * Dear ijerusalem. While this may be true (see WP:TRUTH), at Wikipedia, nothing can be added to an article unless it is sourced and cited to a WP:RS or reliable source where the information can be verified WP:V]. Based on the warnings you have received below, you will soon beWP:BLOCKed for violating WP:3RR if you continue to insist on adding this information against WP:CONSENSUS. Please stop. Find some sources that support what you are trying to add. Open a section on the talk page of the article for discussion. I wouldn't want to see get blocked so early on in your Wikipedia career over a misunderstanding of policy.  T i a m u t talk 18:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Tiamut is right. If the Wikipedia article is wrong, please take your time and explain why on the article's Talk page, using reliable sources. Don't start an edit war over it. The article will still be here tomorrow, and we can fix it then. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Al-Aqsa Mosque‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Al-Aqsa Mosque. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)