User talk:Ijferguson

Please do not remove
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. For some suggestions about the kind of articles Wikipedia is looking for, see our guide to your first article. FreplySpang 19:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks very much to be your own opinion or original research, which are not welcome here - see No original research and Wikipedia is not a soapbox. In other words, it needs to be verifiable with references to reliable external sources. If you cannot provide references to reliable sources, the article is likely to be deleted. FreplySpang 20:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

It is a developed vaild sociological theory based on the ideas on Funcionalism and Emile Durkheim. All sociological theories are ideas, opinions and thoughts, thats the point of it.

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Benjamin Francis Leftwich has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/user/BenjaminLeftwich. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)