User talk:Ijil RHG

Review Request for Carolyn Foronda page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_June_12#Carolyn_Kreiter-Foronda._Poet_Laureate_of_Virginia.2C_Poet.2C_Artist.2C_Sculpture_and_Educator._Seeking_review_of_article._Comments_on_citations_and_flow_of_article.
 * this article has been reviewed. 'unreviewed article tag' may now be removed. july 8, 2011. importScript('User:Btilm/aw.js');

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ijil RHG. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 22:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the Warm Cookie Welcome my favorite! and for the helpful links...hope to see you around. Ijil RHG (talk) 22:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

accurate meanings and time correlations
Hi, please do not use misleading edit summary text, as you did at Isaiah 7:14. You removed "or virgin" as a proposed translation for 'almah', which is the most substantial and relevant point of notability for this subject. It was not a 'minor' edit that you made, nor did you correct a 'typo'. Thank you. Zad68 (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * dear Zab68, a typo is the inclusion of words that are out of place. I do not know about the "notability for this subject" part, but i can imagine that is true, due to the documented history of mis-translations over time. I can understand the history of words and why one word would be used over another. I would love to see a much better article on this topic, including the changing and substituting of word meaning throughout time, because we both know that words change meanings as people use them, as we can experience even today in our own culture. i wish no enemies. nor do i wish ignorance. discuss both and all forms of this word and its meanings throughout time, that would be the best article possible. thank you.Ijil RHG (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * That's not what a typo is. A typo is when the published document does not reflect what was intended, either by misspelling or unintended inclusion of words or exclusion of words.  The article Isaiah 7:14 fully intends to reflect that 'virgin' is a commonly considered translation of 'almah'.  This is true regardless of whether or not you or I agree with it.  I hope you understand now why your edit needed to be reverted.  I agree that the article could definitely use a lot of improvement. P.S. You changed the title that I wrote for this section.  It is considered very improper to change someone else's text and make it appear as if that the edited text is the original work of that person.  You certainly would not someone else writing something you did not write and attributing it to you, I am sure. Take care... Zad68 (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Gathering Light, book.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gathering Light, book.jpg, which you've sourced to (book cover. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.}  Ron h jones (Talk) 01:33, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * hi,i added a "non free book cover" template there, the next step is a separate book article. Slowking4 ⇔ †@1₭ 04:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:2011 06 03 ~ Carolyn, Claudia, Kelly ~ MaryWashingtonU.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 23:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Brinkman Foronda Library of Congress 014.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Carolyn Foronda Press Photo1 Allison.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Contrary Visions book.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Contrary Visions book.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Contrary Visions book.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:33, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Death Comes Riding book.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Death Comes Riding book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Flowering Crimson and Gold1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flowering Crimson and Gold1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Orchid, Lift Your Spirit to the Sun.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Orchid, Lift Your Spirit to the Sun.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Carolyn Foronda Press Photo1 Allison.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carolyn Foronda Press Photo1 Allison.jpg, which you've attributed to Carolyn Kreiter-Foronda. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 21:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)