User talk:Ijustcantstopit

Attendance number
The number as stated in the articles were 100,000 there were not 10,000 people there, but tens of thousands with the article stating that the final tally of people was estimated at 100,000 people, I urge you to cease and desist on this matter. Salandarianflag (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)


 * There's no confirmed number, and the CAA is not a reliable source as they were the organiser and inflate the numbers, nor is The Telegraph. We should use Associated Press and Reuters as more reliable sources on this matter. I think this is fair. Ijustcantstopit (talk) 22:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This is your final warning, if you edit it again, under the 3RR rule I shall bring this to the administration. Salandarianflag (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You undid my first edit of the BBC? Is that not reliable, also you are using sources of which are confirmed to be out of date as they came out during the rally, the sources I provided were from after and are as such more accurate. Salandarianflag (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You are cherry-picking inflated statistics from an unreliable source (CAA, via the Telegraph/BBC). In doing so you are intentionally misleading readers.
 * It was also clear that there were nowhere near the 100,000 figure you're using, I should know, I was there. But that is anecdotal.
 * Reuters and AP are more objective, reliable sources that have chosen to not to use inflated statistics. I would suggest you remove the statistic altogether if you don't intend to provide an accurate one. Ijustcantstopit (talk) 08:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No that is not up to you. Salandarianflag (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The CAA is not an unreliable source, see the Wikipedia source rules. Salandarianflag (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No one is inflating the numbers, cease and desist at once! Salandarianflag (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)