User talk:Ikerm

May 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you removed vandalised information about the company's history, and I appreciated your efforts to do so; unfortunately, your recent addition appears to be extremely promotional. I've taken the liberty to revert the section to a prior revision. If you do not feel that this is constructive in its own right, please discuss this on my talk page. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 07:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of ULMA Construction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ULMA Construction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ULMA Construction until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Are you employed by ULMA or a company being paid to promote them on Wikipedia? shoy (reactions) 13:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

No, I have worked for Eroski, another cooperative of Mondragon Corporation and I am a big fan of the cooperative movement. I try to improve information about work-cooperatives. --Ikerm (talk) 13:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the reply. I would read WP:COI and advise you to approach Mondragon-related topics carefully. shoy (reactions) 13:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve ULMA Group
Hi, I'm Devopam. Ikerm, thanks for creating ULMA Group!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please avoid relying heavily on primary sources for statements. The article has good potential, but it will get into WP:NPOV zone if not edited for same.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Devopam (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * About this newest article, the sources are simply not nearly enough and they're too close as announcements or notices or else the notability will be doubtful as is the case currently; remember that notability cannot be inherited. SwisterTwister   talk  05:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)