User talk:IkhSain

Ways to improve Big Four (Canadian Football)
Thanks for creating Big Four (Canadian Football).

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright on Wikipedia
One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''You are creating articles using entire phrases from copyrighted sources. Please ensure when creating articles you are using your own words and not lifting wholesale text or close paraphrasing from outside sources. As you are new to Wikipedia, I strongly suggest you use the Articles for Creation process to create new articles until you have a better understanding of our policies and guidelines regarding sourcing, notability and copyright.'' Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing through the repeated introduction of copyright violating text to Wikipedia despite multiple warnings. Instead of making the effort to understand why your articles were being deleted, you simply blanked the messages provided to you and renamed the articles in order to bypass the create protection put in place to prevent further copyright violations. You can be unblocked once your agree to abide by Wikipedia's policies regarding copyright and close paraphrasing. I would also like to see an agreement from you that you will use WP:AfC for article creation moving forward, as I suggested here, as a condition of any unblock, but will leave that to the reviewing admin. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:15, 27 November 2018 (UTC)


 * In the repeatedly deleted article Barclay Frost, the entire paragraph starting with "Always interested in sports..." is lifted from this wesbite. You recreated the article under Barclay Frost (track and field) to bypass my protection with the same copyvio in situ. This is just an example, there are more. Again, you need to actually read WP:Copyright and Close paraphrasing and agree that you will write articles using your own words when creating articles moving forward.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright in Canada is almost exactly the same as copyright in the United States. Furthermore, extensive quoting would also be inappropriate here. --Yamla (talk) 02:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Paddon


A tag has been placed on Paul Paddon, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 11:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)