User talk:Ikiroid/User Jimbo v. Willy

German solution
Per German solution, this has been userified as User:Ikiroid/User Jimbo v. Willy. The rmaining redirects have been bypassed, this has been orphaned and therefore can be deleted per GUS. -- Drini 00:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * See Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:User Jimbo v. Willy that the template has been transcluded which appears deletedpage as a template on some user pages. BTW, why didn't you place &lt;noinclude>&lt;/noinclude> around the &#123;{deletedpage}}, that you added to the main page? -- ADNghiem501 01:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

other
I don't think this template is appropriate as it refers to a notorious vandal and I don't think Jimbo would accept it either. Myrtone@User Jimbo v. Willy.com.au:-(
 * I dunno. It survived a TFD. I created it to be more of a clash of ideals: Jimbo represents wikipedia, and Willy is the hordes of vandals who seek to dismantle wikipedia with their short-lived selfish goals. It's a campy homage to him. But seeing as how Jimbo doesn't like userboxes that much, I doubt he'll enjoy this one, though no more or less than the others. But if it truly bothers you, we could relist it or ask Jimbo himself.-- The ikiroid  02:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid I see you argument about Jimmy's representation and Willy's reputation as a complelling argument in favour of deletion. Myrtone@User Jimbo v. Willy.com.au:-|


 * Don't get me wrong...I created the userbox because I believed it was funny. I think it was the first one I ever made. It was a lot more popular than I thought it would be.-- The ikiroid  18:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:User Jimbo v. Willy
Template:User Jimbo v. Willy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Douglasr007 07:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)