User talk:Ila1519

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

No. 662 Squadron AAC
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, No. 662 Squadron AAC, may be copied from http://www.army.mod.uk/aviation/30302.aspx. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry cause the problem. Just trying to work a new page, but sort of forget should use the sandbox. Please just delete the page for me. I shall recreated it later.

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=641373019 your edit] to Prince Harry may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invictus Games Foundation (July 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invictus Games Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Invictus_Games_Foundation Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Invictus_Games_Foundation reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Invictus Games Foundation concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Invictus Games Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Invictus Games Foundation


Hello, Ila1519. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Invictus Games Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I tell you.
You add Phoenix and Las Vegas Film Critics at List of accolades received by Hell or High Water. I tell you now, WikiProject Film does not include non-notable awards like MakeUp Artists Guild, Phoenix Film Critics, Las Vegas Film Critics, Seattle Film Critics, defined as those without a Wikipedia article. Except, you create that non-notable awards I mention above.

You mention Into the Woods and the Lord of the Rings as your references. I check them and delete them some awards because WikiProject Film.

IreneTandry (talk) 14:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nevada Film Critics Society


A tag has been placed on Nevada Film Critics Society, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Vegas Film Critics Society


A tag has been placed on Las Vegas Film Critics Society, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phoenix Film Critics Society


The article Phoenix Film Critics Society has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Previously deleted via an AfD. Concerns not addressed; every reference is to a primary source (the organization itself) with no assertion of importance, nor evidence of in depth coverage.--Hammersoft (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hammersoft (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phoenix Film Critics Society


A tag has been placed on Phoenix Film Critics Society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 18:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
331dot (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nevada Film Critics Society


A tag has been placed on Nevada Film Critics Society, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.nevadafilmcriticssociety.org/index.php?start=26. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Am the Night (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dylan Smith ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/I_Am_the_Night_%28TV_series%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/I_Am_the_Night_%28TV_series%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Violence of Action (film)
Hello, Ila1519,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Violence of Action (film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Violence of Action (film).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 09:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Pine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Do not add rowspans per WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Also do not delete notes specifically telling you not to do so'' LADY LOTUS • TALK 04:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't mean to upset you, I made a mistake for take the past edits for granted. I take full responsibility for that. However, can I ask you one thing if I may, as an actor's tv credits for like Top Gear or SNL is just every now and then, do we really put the list based on the show name? Can we use the yearly order then? Also take SNL for example, if they not always been host, how we mention the other appearances for roles of the show or we need to change to the other format like the example 2 for actors. Thank you for writing to me. Wish you a very happy New Year in advance.Ila1519 (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. In regards to the SNL/Top Gear question, could you give me an example of what you mean? If they just appear on SNL once or twice without being the host then it's however they are credited on that episode, most of the time it's just as "himself" or "herself". But if you have an example of what you're meaning, I'd be happy to look at it LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I think the best way I can describe is they attended the show as guests. Ex: Ryan Reynolds in Top Gear S18 EP3 or like when Zachary Quinto, Chris Pine on the Weekend Update segment of SNL in 2009, or even like this one: (https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/05/melissa-mccarthy-snl-blake-lively-ryan-reynolds).  I think maybe just Himself/Herself for the actors' credits, right? Thank you
 * I think I prefer the old format for the TV section on Pine's page, because it's more clear and detailed for my liking, but I understand it's not for the format they had. Thank you.Ila1519 (talk) 13:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)