User talk:Ilikelifesciences

Welcome...

Hello, Ilikelifesciences, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome! Mike Cline (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Cryptosporidium
Hi, I saw your comment about Cryptosporidium in Template talk:taxobox. You're right, the taxonomy in the Cryptosporidium article was obsolete. Current phylogeny seems to show that Cryptosporidium does not belong under Coccidiasina, but there isn't yet a consensus on its place in the the hierarchy. It might form a sister group with Coccidia and Gregarinasina (see Adl et al, 2012). Recently, Ruggiero et al, 2015 fleshed out the taxonomy for the group, filling in gaps between phylum and family (class Gregarinomorphea, subclass Cryptogregaria, order Cryptogregarida), however their groups are new and there is not yet any consensus on their usefulness. In the interim, I've simply deleted the ranks between genus and phylum on the Cryptosporidium taxobox (as in Adl et al, 2012). When consensus forms around a new taxonomy, we can reintroduce the missing ranks. Deuterostome (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DNA transposons has been accepted
 DNA transposons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  07:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=DNA_transposons help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,Rosguill talk 22:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK)


Hello, Ilikelifesciences. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Genome Analysis Toolkit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I apologise to bother you, but if you don't mind, I'd like to ask a question regarding the article Transposable element. I believe it should include some information on the so-called Class III TEs, e.g. Foldback (FB) elements (see: Pierre Capy et al., Dynamics and Evolution of Transposable Elements, 1998). What are your thoughts? Thank you very much. --Pinoczet (talk) 21:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)