User talk:Ilikerabbits!

September 2017
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Supersessionism. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 07:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC) ...including (and repeatedly even after warnings and blocks) sanitizing/whitewashing and related NPOV on various religious articles, and altering/removing talkpage comments of other editors and of yours after others have responded. DMacks (talk) 07:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I only delteted talk page comments from me
 * {unblock|1=i only deleted m talk page comments}


 * You'll also want to show that you have read and understood the rationale given by the admin who blocked you, and to convince us that those issues will not recur. Huon (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: I decided to comment because I remember you and I think that I understand where you're coming from. It's not a joy to see editors get blocked. While this block is technically indefinite, it does not mean that it necessarily will be, but since it is not the first block and that an alternative to an indefinite block at this point could have been from two weeks to three months, I recommend to take some time off and think about all this, to not evade the block and to file a convincing unblock request in a few weeks. Maybe that an administrator will agree to lift the block and allow a third chance to WP:CLEANSTART then (but I cannot guarantee it, it'll be their decision to make and will depend on your arguments). Farewell, — Paleo Neonate  – 16:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleting material from your own user talk page is permitted (WP:BLANKING).
 * Deleting comments on other talk pages is also permitted and even indicated in cases of obviously unconstructive comments (or posts from block-evading users, see WP:DENY).
 * In this case you were not only deleting your own comments from article talk pages (not your user page), but also blanking comments of several other editors. I also remember cases where you modified your own comments after other editors (including myself) responded, causing other editors to also amend their comments for them to adjust to the new context, which is suspicious (may appear intellectually dishonest).
 * But the main problem was persistent POV pushing while not forming or respecting consensus resulting from related discussions (see WP:NPOV, WP:BRD, WP:CONSENSUS).
 * Several editors have warned multiple times that Wikipedia is not for promotion or soapboxing. We all have our personal beliefs but articles should result in summaries of what reliable sources say (ideally secondary sources).  See WP:RS, WP:ONUS, WP:SOAPBOXING.

February 2021

 * I'd support WP:Standard offer. I am not concerned about the topic focus, but about the edits themselves. I'm not sure whether the process is that I accept and perform the unblock (as blocking admin) or just leave this note here for Daniel Case (who is currently reviewing the block). DMacks (talk) 04:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I was actually just in the process of accepting the unblock ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcome back Ilikerabbits, — Paleo Neonate  – 17:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)