User talk:Ilikeyoutoo yay

Welcome!
Peaceray (talk) 19:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sexual intercourse, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You're new so I wouldn't expect you to understand WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller  talk 09:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Handling controversies in articles
Please read Wikipedia:Criticism. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sure, apologies for any mistake :) Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laxminarayan Innovation Technological University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambani family (August 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ambani family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Ambani_family Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ambani_family reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ambani family
Hello, Ilikeyoutoo yay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ambani family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Edits on Bhavish Aggarwal regarding his homophobic comments
This is regarding your edit on Bhavish Aggarwal in which you removed the word controversy and replaced it with "personal views." The reason for this seems a bit inexplicable to me. The point is that his personal views did create a controversy. Everyone have personal views and they do not have a place in Wikipedia, only those views which are controversial in this case allegedly homophobic are included on any wikipedia page. That said you also talked about how personal views are protected under Indian constitution. First of all, Wikipedia has nothing to do with the Indian constitution and more importantly the constitution does not guarantee hate speech.

I will revert back your edits unless you have a concrete answer. NerdboiIndia (talk) 18:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)