User talk:IlirianEagle

September 2009
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Alexikoua. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RaseaC (talk) 23:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

My edits
Firstly, don't ever threaten me again. I edit WP using a programme that simply shows me inappropriate edits, such as the one you left which read like a threat so that's why I deleted it. I don't write the warning, that's put there automatically. I have identified myself, you can reach me, so what else do you want? RaseaC (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

The information you are adding to the Epirus disambiguation page does not belong there because that page is simply there to direct readers to any number of pages they may have been looking for. Please stop re-adding this information or, as the above editor has said, you will be blocked from editing WP. Thank you. RaseaC (talk) 23:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)