User talk:Ilivebythesea

Welcome
Hello, Ilivebythesea, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2013
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Lytham St Annes with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate may links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. (t) Josve05a  (c)  15:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Poulton-le-Fylde with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Frosted Δ 14  15:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

All - Understand your comments, but this website is a high traffic resource for vistors and locals alike. Yes they are our websites, but the information is accurate, up to date and informative. We are independent, but work closely with local authority and the main players in Blackpool (eg Marketing Blackpool). I have added 7 ext links (Fylde Coast / Poulton-Le-Fylde / Fleetwood / Cleveleys / Lytham St Annes / Blackpool). Cleveleys.co.uk is one example of an external link of a similar nature to mine, except this one has 'out of date' information and product sales. Please take time to reconsider and let me know the outcome. Ilivebythesea (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC) Just read the guidelines and believe the above links should be re-instated. These website are run by TheRabbitPatch Ltd and conforms to: Is the site content accessible to the reader? Is the site content proper in the context of the article (useful, tasteful, informative, factual, etc.)? Is the link functioning and likely to remain functional? I can also guarantee that they have longevity as they will become an integral part of the marketing of the area by local authority groups. Marketing Blackpool are integrating the 'live' aspect of the website into their own website. The content is both of historical interest, current news, and an invaluable resource for the local community. Happy to listen to your contra arguments if appropriate.