User talk:Illegal editor

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! MastCell Talk 23:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Piri piri

 * The picture does seem piri piri, but strangely the plant is too low, and the fruit seems a bit bigger for such a low plant, but it does seem piri piri, not malagueta at all. Use it in your meals (cheaken, pork, fish), you wont regret it :P --Pedro 15:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Test

Blocked
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

Block submitted for review at WP:AN/I here.

Look. I am a sockpuppet of myself and myself only. I am NOT A SOCKPUPPET OF BILLY EGO. I have created MANY MANY sockpuppets, but they are NOT OF BILLY EGO. Look at the Billy Ego case! The guy was blocked for pushing fascism. He was a self-proclaimed fascist! I HATE fascism. There is no evidence of any of my sockpuppets pushing fascism, for crying out loud. Billy Ego apparently lives in the same area and shared or had a similar IP. That is the only evidence they have for me being a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. It's not true. The reason I create multiple sockpuppets of myself is because it makes it harder to be detected. Am I going to have to start making a different sockpuppet for every single edit? How can I get this block lifted? As it stands I am blocked for life. It's truly absurd. I have to sneak around making sockpuppets so that I can improve Wikipedia. God knows that's all I'm doing, is improving Wikipedia. I'm pushing for things to be sourced, sourcing nearly everything I add to articles (with only a few neglectful oversights in that area which I source when requested), and fighting against original research. How can I get this block lifted? Somebody needs to go back and review the Billy Ego case. Due diligence was not done. Who can I speak to about this? Illegal editor 06:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

By the way, my roomate is also affected by this. He's having to do the same thing, which is make multiple usernames to avoid being wrongly blocked with the false claim that he is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. Illegal editor 07:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Haha. You guys are crazy! I am not a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. I might have the same ISP or live in the same area as Billy Ego, but I'm not him! A checkuser does not prove it. Look at why Billy Ego was blocked. He was blocked for pushing fascism. None of my multiple usernames have pushed fascism. What's hapenning is you're finding multiple usernames of *ME*, not Billy Ego. I really need to talk to someone higher up in the hiearchy about this. A mistake was made in the Billy Ego arbitration case. The only evidence was a checkuser, which simply turned up people in the same geographic area ...none of which pushed a fascist POV. I'm a free-marketer, guys. That's the opposite of fascism. Who can I speak to higher up in the adminstration hieararchy? Illegal editor 07:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

No offense, but you administrators are the equivalent of a bunch of incompetant telephone operators at a third world call center. That's ok. I understand that you are just menial workers. How competant can someone that works for free be? But the problem is you don't have supervisors that I can request to be put on the phone. Maybe this is why Wikipedia doesn't work. You guys have no supervisors. I guess the multiple usernames will go on then, and in greater numbers. There's already many more than I'm using that you haven't found. I'm just going to have to change strategies to make them more difficult to find. Believe me, I have a lot of tricks up my sleeve and will get this down to a exact science. Illegal editor 07:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

"Illegal editor" was just a test account anyway. Look at the username. How much more obvious could I make it that I was a blocked user? If it took that long time to figure it out, then I'm well on my way to being totally undetectable. (And don't think I know the editing style's some of you are looking for. I don't use those styles on all my usernames.) Illegal editor 08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

As a test, I just made an edit with another username. Can you guys find it? Illegal editor 08:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Didn't think you would. Illegal editor 08:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)