User talk:Illegally

May 2024
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You and your friends have been involved in disruption of several articles (specifically regarding Albania), constantly reverting and blocking information you don't like even though is factual and sourced. You should be careful of getting blocked as well.
 * Information on Wikipedia must be free of biases and censoring. There is a reason why Wikipedia is open for everyone to edit, but it seems you've been trying to block everyone from editing. Your attempts won't last long.
 * Just by looking at your contribution history we can see who is the one doing edit wars.
 * If you disagree with a contribution, you explain your reasons and if I'm wrong (which I doubt), then I would agree to change it. Illegally (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Illegally, do not send me any more e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Why? I'm not allowed to ask for a comment on your decision to block me?
 * I asked that you proper investigate my "accusations" made on Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring and not disregard them straight away.
 * You also added "WP:LOUTSOCK with Special:contributions/2A02:908:1997:1500:0:0:0:0/64" as a reason for blocking me, which has nothing to do with me. On what basis you came to that conclusion?


 * Can you please explain what specific accounts you're referring to when you use "everyone" in "you've been trying to block everyone from editing" and who "we" are when you state "we can see who is the one doing edit wars" in your post above?-- Ponyo bons mots 19:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Ponyo,
 * It seemed to me that the user had been reverting edits by made by other people, hence "everyone", no specific accounts to mention, it was just a general look on the user's history. But I guess I might have exaggerated and misjudged that.
 * "We" is just a way of expression.
 * Thanks for your consideration. Illegally (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)