User talk:Illmacul8

May 2017
Hello, I'm Oluwa2Chainz. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Adekunle Gold, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Removing content
Hi, RE your repeated removal of the "Controversy" section on the Michael Ugwu article, you can't simply remove information with multiple reputable sources by saying "this is false." If you can demonstrate it's not true and the sources are wrong, you should post about it on the Talk page for the article and explain why you're removing the content. As of right now this appears to be valid and relevant information. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not here for promotion and "good" things, but all notable information about the topic. JamesG5 (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have restored the controversy section, I am going to comment on the talk page about it, but as I have noted above please do not simply remove relevant sourced material with no explanation. JamesG5 (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Still on Page removal
@JamesG5 good evening again, I get your point and the angle you are coming from, but I can also mention to you a couple of Wikipedia pages where the full information or negative information was left off, That part is meant to be left off currently till a time soon, Thank you for leaving the page and not editing it again. thanks. Warm regards
 * There is no "meant to be." That is not how Wikipedia works.  I didn't edit it again because it would be in violation of certain Wikipedia policies, policies which you are currently violating.  I've referred it to an admin. JamesG5 (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that in this edit to Michael Ugwu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flooded  with them hundreds 11:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Links
Hello @JamesG5 kindly find links below that put more light on the former links

http://venturesafrica.com/jason-njokus-iroko-has-serious-structural-problems-michael-ugwu/

http://soundcity.tv/news/sony-music-west-africas-michael-ugwu-replies-ycee/

Trust you are doing great day. Have a great day
 * Ok, here's the thing. Him denying it (and those same tweets of him responding to YCEE were in one of the articles I cited" does NOT mean that you simply remove the material.  He said it's not true, that doesn't mean the accusations don't exist.  The way to handle that would be to add a line saying "Ugwu has denied YCEE's accusations and called them defamatory. (reference link)  He has also denied IROKING's charges, saying they wanted to exit the business. (reference link)."  That's the appropriate way to handle it, rather than hiding it. JamesG5 (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I restored the section. Just to be clear, your friend/client denying something doesn't make it not true.  The proper thing to do is link his denial, not hide the issue.  I added your new link.  And as noted before, your links only address the iRocking issue, not the YCEE issue so at the very least the YCEE issue would remain, you've provided nothing about that.  Wikipedia is not a venue for only saying nice things when there are public controversies. JamesG5 (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Section removed
@JamesG5 thanks, I will look into that, thank you very much Illmacul8 (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Ugwu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I see that despite previous notices from myself & other editors you have again removed a huge section of content from Michael Ugwu. Reiterating what we've said, you should not remove sourced content without explanation. You have also stated repeatedly here on your talk page and on the article page that you're working with or for Ugwu and are deliberately trying to slant the page in his favor. This is not allowed, and you've never formally declared a conflict of interest as required by policy here. Please refrain from making edits or changes to the article without explanation. JamesG5 (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)