User talk:Illuminus Knight

Atheism statements
Thank you for your contribution. I noticed that much of it is adding statement in biographical articles that a person was an atheist. This information is referenced to two generic websites. Whereas it is definitely good to add available sourced info to Wikipedia, I do not think such blank addition is appropriate. Usually, it is pretty difficult to say whether a person is an atheist, an agnostic, or is religions but does not state it openly. Additionally, the religious views sometimes change. We can only know for sure if the person admits it themselves, and even then sometimes they are not to be taken seriously. Therefore adding this info requires an exceptionally good sources and may only be appropriate with a reference to specialized biographic info, for example, a book about a person, where such statements would be referenced and analyzed. This is definitely within the spirit of WP:EXCEPTIONAL, WP:WEIGHT, and WP:YESPOV. I will revert some of your lates edits. If you have good arguments why such additions are a good idea and do not contradict our policies, a good way to proceed would be to open a request for comment, for example, at Village pump (policy). Thanks again.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Just to make it clear, I am not reverting your edits where those are well cited, e.g. to biographies published by respected publishing houses.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Abuse of multiple accounts
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)