User talk:Ilovethewordacclaimok

Welcome to Wikipedia Based on your username and previous edits that you have made you should be warned that acclaim is word that tends to show bias and only adds fluff to articles... Please see WP:PEACOCK for more information...

If you have any questions, leave a message on my talk page or stop by the community portal for more information on guidelines of Wikipedia.

Please note I WP:AGF but I reverted some of your recent edits.

Again if you have questions feel free to comment on my talk page. Thanks! Kmg90 (talk) 01:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Late Registration does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries explain what your intentions are for edits that may otherwise be reverted (WP:FIES). Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Metropolis: Suite I (The Chase), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Judas (song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  02:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Adding "acclaim"
I must ask: What is your reason for systematically including this word? -- Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 04:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hairspray (2007 film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Artpop, you may be blocked from editing.  STATic  message me!  19:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Do What U Want, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  STATic  message me!  18:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)