User talk:ImNotObama

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

''Comments that I made were about the political positions section. Hardly vandalism.''

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.


 * I think your unblock request, and your history, speak for themselves, but another admin will be along to review your request. MastCell Talk 00:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * You are being nasty for blocking me. I don't even support Kossack, just trying to be a voice of reason.  You are making people mad at Wikipedia.  That's not what administrators are suppose to do.  What are you going to say when the checkuser shows that Kossack was editing in Chicago the same time I was editing a thousand miles away?  A very honourable person would block himself in compensation but you won't do this.  I hope you will be kind and say sorry.  I am skeptical you will even do that.  Why are you so mean? ImNotObama (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * MastCell, I see that you have not submitted a checkuser request. I am very disappointed at you.  Even if you were suspicious, you should have submitted a checkuser request before blocking.  Please unblock me yourself and submit a checkuser request ImNotObama (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It is amusing that ImNotObama seems to assume that administrators (and editors generally) are unaware of technologies like telnet and ssh and vnc (and those Windows things like Citrix and Remote Desktop). I don't doubt that K4T/WB/CB/etc. are able to connect to machines in Atlanta while sitting in Chicago.  Hint: I can do the same thing, as can millions of others of editors who are even slightly technically savvy.  LotLE × talk  08:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I am quite aware of such technologies. I am also aware that guns exist. Does this mean you've killed someone then, Lulu? Same logic. --Rebroad (talk) 20:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, same logic is this: The fact that I do not have a gun on my desk now is not very good evidence that I have not shot someone.  LotLE × talk  20:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I posted this at rebroad's talk page. I thought it might be of interest here.

ImNotObama’s wikipedia career in summary (b. 11/8/08, d. 11/12/08):

1st edit: Long, annoying and contentious criticism on Obama talk page, followed by call for up down on consensus 2nd edit: nonesense sentence on own userpage. 3rd edit: All cap demands about what people MUST do on obama talk page on an issue that had already been talked and argued to death 4th edit: Enters own votes on own consensus call made in first ever wikipedia edit. 5th edit: Launches an attack on wikidemon at AN/I while simultaneously replacing a “resolved” template with an “unresolved” one. Fails to mention this in edit summary. Edits 6-20: Alternates obstinately and unproductively stirring trouble on Obama talk-page withh pushing commas around in random articles, both characteristic of the BfP cast of characters. Edit 21: defends self from vandalism warning. Edit 22: contests indef blocking of proven BfP socks at AN/I Edit 23: makes a perfect unblock template request at proven BfP sock K4T’s talk page with a spurious reason for unblocking. Edit 24: makes a contested edit to Obama main article (with the characteristic BfP misleading edit summary) absent consensus on talk page. BLOCKED Next few edits: Whining about check users and “proving” this or that in a manner thoroughly typical and diagnostic of the BfP class of socks. Then you took up his cause.Bali ultimate (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Block review requested
Hi ImNotObama. I've requested your block is reviewed as it's not clear to me why you've been blocked. The least the blocking admin could have done (IMHO) is to have referenced your edits that were the cause for the block. From looking at your edit history I've not yet been able to find anything to warrant a block. Cheers, --Rebroad (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/ImNotObama for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)