User talk:ImTheMillions

September 2018
Hello, I'm Enivid. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to EB-5 visa have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Enivid (talk) 13:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

That is completely unacceptable, I'm a licensed professional in the topic. In not instance I did any advertise or mentioned to any promotional reference. I just contributed to the content because you the EB-5 there is two ways to make it "alone-or-trough a licensed professional" Which I'm. I just add the link as a reference that professional guidance is one of the choices. also is important to make reference that is the ONLY THIRD PARTY really authorized federally to bring guidance about it.

Also the article mention professional make commission for their service. HOWEVER didn't mention the commission is pay by the developer and don't diminish the investment made by the investor. Because the same amount they invest is the same amount they receive in refund after all the term and conditions of the program has been satisfied.

READ my edit one more time, I did a very carefully modification following all the guidelines for the Government program without direct inclination but neither a diminished as is the article now which try to let the people know the third party approved by the government trough regional center is in disadvantage of the customer because they make commission, but unfairly explained to the people that this paid by the developer never reducing the amount invested and also is the only third party authorized which is the most reliable way to be engaged.

Thank you so much.

Feel free to reed one more time my text, Take in consideration that if We have approval by the government We are a reliable source.

That is completely unacceptable, I'm a licensed professional in the topic. In not instance I did any advertise or mentioned to any promotional reference. I just contributed to the content because you the EB-5 there is two ways to make it "alone-or-trough a licensed professional" Which I'm. I just add the link as a reference that professional guidance is one of the choices. also is important to make reference that is the ONLY THIRD PARTY really authorized federally to bring guidance about it.

Also the article mention professional make commission for their service. HOWEVER didn't mention the commission is pay by the developer and don't diminish the investment made by the investor. Because the same amount they invest is the same amount they receive in refund after all the term and conditions of the program has been satisfied.

READ my edit one more time, I did a very carefully modification following all the guidelines for the Government program without direct inclination but neither a diminished as is the article now which try to let the people know the third party approved by the government trough regional center is in disadvantage of the customer because they make commission, but unfairly explained to the people that this paid by the developer never reducing the amount invested and also is the only third party authorized which is the most reliable way to be engaged.

Thank you so much.

Feel free to reed one more time my text, Take in consideration that if We have approval by the government We are a reliable source.