User talk:ImacelebritygetmeoutofhereAU

WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE Hi Welcome To My talk page im a big Fan of Big Brother and Im a Celebrity Get Me out of Here AU

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm blocking you because your username is identical to a well-known television show, which can give off the impression that you are representing this show. Even if you aren't, this is still a violation of username protocol. It also looks extremely likely that you are User:Smuge22 trying to evade a block and re-add articles about Web Films. Please do not do this- so far you have not shown where Web Films would pass notability guidelines and re-adding these will only end with the accounts getting blocked and the articles deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Even if you are not a sock, you do appear to be working with this person to reintroduce the pages. If you are unblocked you will have to change your username and show that you understand that you cannot recreate any articles for Web Films. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Web films au3.png
Thanks for uploading File:Web films au3.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)