User talk:Imakijeff

January 2023
Hello, I'm ProClasher97. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ProClasher 9 7  ~  Have A Question?  10:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Andrew E.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Andrew E., you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to The Fabulous. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Lemonaka (talk) 11:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)