User talk:Imaperv69

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Enron scandal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Enron scandal was changed by Imaperv69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970952 on 2016-04-06T14:48:39+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Aiello. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Danny Aiello was changed by Imaperv69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977477 on 2016-04-07T13:38:23+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Enron scandal with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Widr (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)