User talk:Imarsollek

July 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dan Zulla. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi [[User:reddogsix| red dogsix] - I dont think that your way of handling these things is appropriate, your tone and your technical understanding are not relevant to this field of science. The person as repeatedly published significant vulnerabilities to Internet core infrastructure pieces such as Google Chrome and Github, and for that reason alone, does not deserve your "request for speedy deletion".
 * Comment - Given you have no knowledge of my "expertise" your comment is WP:UNCIVIL and fails to WP:AGF. I suggest yo stop your disruptive editing.   red dogsix (talk) 22:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Will do stop the requested editing, but deleting the ugly red exclamation mark comment. Thanks.

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Dan Zulla. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 22:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Dan Zulla, you may be blocked from editing. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 22:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

At least now we know that reddogsix has too much free time.


 * Comment - You are really not helping your case by violating WP:UNCIVIL. I suggest you take the time to read it and at least try to understand what it means to a member of the Wikipedia community before you contribute further.   red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

I understand, and apologize for my previous tone. Please also understand, that there is quite some knowledge to be transferred here, and it's seriously a lot, and very technical. Thank you for your input. Maybe we can co work on the Wikipedia article about the Siemens S7 protocol, or Internet Scans of University of Michigan; or do you know somebody? --Imarsollek (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:DanZulla.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DanZulla.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Zulla


A tag has been placed on Dan Zulla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Abe Froman (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)