User talk:Imbecilica

Regarding your edits to Aranmore:
Your recent edit to Aranmore (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 15:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Aranmore
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Imbecilica! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|svg), is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 15:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Urobasican
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Urobasican, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Urobasican.  Acroterion  (talk)  17:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Urobasican
I have nominated Urobasican, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Urobasican. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Acroterion  (talk)  18:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a place to publish original thought (see What Wikipedia is not). A reference to a forum with articles by yourself does not establish notability.WhaleyTim (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Final warning
This is your final warning. Do NOT delete or vandalise an AfD under discussion, as you did in this edit. If this happens again you will be blocked from editing. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page.  Acroterion  (talk)  19:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)