User talk:Imbetrthenu26

 Hi Imbetrthenu26, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

 Good luck, and have fun.  Legosock (talk) 23:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adam Smith (awsome 11 year old)
A tag has been placed on Adam Smith (awsome 11 year old) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 11:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Jerzy•t 02:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adam Smith (future millionare)
A tag has been placed on Adam Smith (future millionare), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc Talk 20:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adam Smith (awsome guy)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Adam Smith (awsome guy), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Also, stop introducing deleted articles like Adam Smith (Whoever) to Wikipedia, as this might result in getting you blocked. Shovon (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Acme party co, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shovon (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

STOP
Please stop your Vandalism. Else, you will be blocked. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 14:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 17:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

To misbehavior responders: --Jerzy•t 19:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. The purpose of this formal "extension" of your already indefinite block is to record here the fact of your use, while blocked, of an IP sockpuppet (to repeat essentially the same unsuitable addition to WP). And i suppose, since i appear above in the third person, i should make it clear that i've got no hard feelings about your 4-fold vandalism of my user page: i said to myself, when i went to the IP talk page in response to the IP edit and read the last section, "What, i don't remember seeing all those speedy notices! Oh, that's not my sig; you mean some fool screwed with my user-page again?" (Some editors display a count of the number of vandalizations of their respective user pages, but i doubt i'd find it enough fun to justify the effort, and tentatively IMO it's an unnecessary provocation more than it serves to alert folks in your former mood to what a futile gesture such vand'm is.) You should figure out what WP is really about, and how to treat colleagues collegially, and then ask nicely for another chance. (Oh, yeah, and it wouldn't be a bad thing to learn to spell "awesome", tho you won't have much use for it here.) --Jerzy•t 19:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Unsuitable Username
Our usual response to usernames like yours, which on reflection, seems intended to say:
 * I ' m better then you.

is: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

IMO the fact that it looks to anyone who fails to treat it as a puzzle like just another tediously unpronounceable username makes it even more offensive -- less civil -- than it could be, bcz it suggests your secretly sneering especially at those you consider unclever for not happening to decode it. If your current block is lifted, i will refer your username to Usernames for administrator attention, and if i find it listed there by another user, i will block it as unsuitable. For that reason, i suggest you make proposing a new (and BTW short and easily pronounceable) username part of any efforts you undertake for the lifting of your current block. --Jerzy•t 20:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)