User talk:Imbunty

Welcome
Hello, Imbunty, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Copyright violaiton
Your addition to Jai_Ho_(film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

This is the edit --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Your addition to Kisse Pyaar Karoon has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Psychonaut. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gunday without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Psychonaut (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sainanehwal.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sainanehwal.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Gopinath Munde
Hello, while improving or copy editing an article, please do not remove sourced content and citations without any explanations as you did at Gopinath Munde article recently. Jethwarp (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2021 Women's Cricket World Cup for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Women's Cricket World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2021 Women's Cricket World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carwile2 *Shoot me a message* 21:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Women's Cricket World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2017 Women's Cricket World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carwile2 *Shoot me a message* 21:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Improper reversion at Hate Story 3
Surely when you reverted my removal of the Hate Story 3 plot summary you saw my rationale: I have to remove the plot summary because it is based on content stolen from http://www.hindustantimes.com/movie-reviews/hate-story-3-review-they-danced-bathed-screamed-and-bored/story-AuxXFMSGKf9HS3ke4dsQjI.html See talk page. I went the extra step to clarify in detail why I removed the content. Reverting without a valid rationale is disruptive and runs afoul of the community aspect of this collaborative encyclopedia. If you want to take a stab at rewording that entire first paragraph, you're welcome to, but we cannot have stolen content in our articles. I would say that this is a no-brainer, but I also notice that you've received at least three warnings so far about adding copyrighted content to articles. Please stop doing this, as it only hurts Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Plot at Kyaa Kool Hain Hum 3
Hi there, can you please explain why the plot you added here can also be found here? Please note that I do expect a reply, and if you do not provide one, or if your explanation is insufficient, I will interrupt your editing privileges. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rustom (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shaandaar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mehreen Pirzada, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diff: See WP:BLPPRIVACY. When you publish a living person's birthdate at Wikipedia, you risk violating their privacy. Only when the content is widely published (i.e. from reliable sources) would the information be considered in the public domain.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Dubs
Hi there, I don't understand this edit, where you add Hindi to the list of languages for Baahubali. The film was originally shot in Tamil and Telugu, not Hindi. We don't typically include dubs in lists of this type. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, The film was also released in Hindi language, hence the collection also includes Hindi language shows earning. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imbunty (talk • contribs)
 * As far as I am aware, the film was dubbed in Hindi, not filmed in Hindi. So Hindi doesn't belong in that table. Many films are dubbed in many languages. If we log them all, the language field will take over all of the content in the article, distracting from the focus, which is worldwide gross revenue. Worldwide gross is presumed to take into account all of the various languages the film might be dubbed in. In a gross list, we don't care that Avengers: Civil War was released in Italian, and if we were to list all of the languages it was dubbed or subtitled in, we'd be swimming in 150 languages. Note that at List of highest-grossing films, we don't even include language. Only because of the ethnic uproar from various members of India's ethnic subdivisions do we even care that a film was released in Tamil or in Telugu.


 * As a side note, please remember to sign your talk page comments with four tildes: ~ . Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi thanks for the side notice. As per my knowledge Bahubali had a full fledged Hindi released along with Tamil & Telugu. It was not just dubbed but released in equal number of Hindi theaters, hence i believe Hindi language should be mentioned in table.

It's ok if you think otherwise. Thanks, nice chatting. Imbunty (talk) 04:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Summaries of critical response
Hi there, re: this, firstly, this should not have been marked as a minor edit, because it is not a cosmetic change, you snuck in a summary of critical response, which could absolutely be disputed.

Secondly, per MOS:FILM, "The overall critical response to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources." So who has described the overall response as "mixed"? Where is the reliable source that says this? Summaries of critical response should be attributed to specific voices. Why? Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) So that editors don't accidentally pollute articles with their own biases, ex: by cherrypicking negative reviews and then summarising that selection as "negative" and
 * 2) So that editors don't accidentally confirm someone else's bias, ex: by coming across another editor's selection of cherrypicked negative reviews and then making a personal determination that the entirety of critical response must be negative because the reviews in the article skew negative.

February 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Akshay Kumar. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Unclear what the point of these changes was
I'm not clear how these edits were improvements, since the net result was that you deleted two maintenance templates at the top of the article and reformatted a reference for no clear reason. If you want to experiment, please use your sandbox, not live articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kisse Pyaar Karoon


The article Kisse Pyaar Karoon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  03:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kisse Pyaar Karoon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kisse Pyaar Karoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kisse Pyaar Karoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Donald D23  talk to me  03:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crew (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)