User talk:Imcardle

Contego
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Contego, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.contego.com.au. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Contego
A tag has been placed on Contego requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DougsTech (talk) 05:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Repeating something I said at the article's talk page: All things considered, you'd be better advised to start fresh with neutral text instead of ad copy taken from their website. —C.Fred (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, main space articles aren't the place to ask for a page to be restored. Please see Restore. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * HI there - I agree except my article has been stolen by an admin, deleted, repeated attempts for someone to please reinstate or explain how I can correct my article so it remains intact for more than thirty minutes are entirely ignored and then laughably also DELETED. I am completely frustrated with this whole process and sadly am reconsidering contributing at all. Please help me... Imcardle (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)imcardle

Deletion
There is so much wrong with this article.
 * Much of the text is taken from the Contego website which states © 2007-2009, Cronos Software. All rights reserved. and therefore is violating the site's copyright. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at the article talk page saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
 * The images are also a copyright violations as screenshots of copyrighted software
 * Wikipedia does not provide a free advertising service. The article has several unsourced claims without independent verifiable sources eg
 * Contego was used with great success in 2009
 * This allows for a cost effective and portable solution.
 * When is Contego Used? whole section is how-to. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not an instruction manual
 * Articles should be neutral and encyclopaedic
 * There is nothing wrong with giving the official site as a link, but you also need independent verifiable sources to show that it meets the notability guidelines.

Hope this helps jimfbleak (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much Jim
Brilliant. Thank you so much Jim - I will correct everything you have suggested. Imcardle (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)imcardle

Speedy deletion of Contego
A tag has been placed on Contego, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. treelo radda  16:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)