User talk:Imeldific

Imeldific, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Imeldific! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:16, Thursday, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Imelda Marcos has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Imelda Marcos was changed by Imeldific (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853647 on 2015-07-29T00:44:08+00:00.

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 03:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Imelda Marcos
Hello Imeldific,

I am disappointed that not only have you again edited without any edit summary, but you have reverted a perfectly legitimate edit I made  to the Imelda Marcos page. You could also have informed of why you did this on my talk page, though an edit summary is preferred (both is of course even better!).

• You may need to look at the WP:manual of style (WP:MOS) at WP:SURNAME where you will find that as this is an encyclopaedia we do not refer to persons by their first name, in most cases. Therefore the page should not refer to Imelda Marcos as 'Imelda' throughout the entire page. It starts to sound like a promotional 'Fan' page if we do that. Referring to the person by their surname is normal practise, except where she and her husband are both being mentioned, and then their first names are used to prevent confusion about which 'Marcos' is being refereed to.

• See also WP:Ownership. Your username suggests the possibility of a WP:Conflict of interest (WP:COI).

I am also aware of your request to move the page to Imelda. 220  of  Borg 03:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Imelda Marcos, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  Related edits are here, where you have totally removed other editors comments without giving any reason or even an edit summary for doing so. 220  of  Borg 05:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Imeldific, you should not be changing the importance level for WikiProjects listed at Talk:Imelda Marcos. It is up for each WikiProject to determine how important an article is for that particular project. Originally, the Fashion WikiProject listed the article at Mid importance; you have changed this twice, first to High and now to Top. I am restoring it to Mid; please do not edit this again. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Imelda Marcos
You removed any descriptions which has sources. Your violent behavior is the very Vandalism.--Y.haruo (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imelda Marcos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you there? FunkMonk (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=708608049 your edit] to Imelda Marcos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Bling Ring|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/05/13/bling-ring|publisher=The New Yorker |accessdate=March 6, 2016}}

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
The article Imelda Marcos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Imelda Marcos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imelda Marcos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Imelda Marcos
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

conjugal dictatorship listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conjugal dictatorship. Since you had some involvement with the conjugal dictatorship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * This edit added Community article probation at Talk:Conjugal dictatorship. What is the reason for that? I do not see a similar notice at Talk:Ferdinand Marcos. This question was raised at WP:MISC. If there is a link to a community discussion which justifies the tag, please add it at WP:MISC. Otherwise, please remove the tag. Johnuniq (talk) 02:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Imelda (criminal) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Imelda (criminal). Since you had some involvement with the Imelda (criminal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alsee (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Conjugal dictatorship
Hello! Your submission of Conjugal dictatorship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Imelda Marcos
I have included the content that she was a "kleptocrat" with the required citation. Why are you removing reliably sourced content from an article?

Your name and edit history suggest that you are a single purpose account with a conflict of interest.

Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Spacecowboy420. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Imelda Marcos has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Following your ANI reports regarding my conduct, I thought it would be best to contact you here, to try and clear the air and explain what I consider the problem to be.

1. Your ANI reports seemed to be an act of revenge, because you didn't like me removing your content. That's ok with me this time, but the next time you have a content dispute with someone, it's a far better idea to discuss the content, rather than looking for revenge. 2. Your content seems to be unsourced and giving undue positive weight to Imelda Marcos. It doesn't matter what your personal opinion of her is, we always try to make a fair and balanced article. Unfortunately for the entire Marcos clan, the overwhelming opinion on reliable sources is rather negative, so that is what the article reflects. 3. Single purpose account - ie. you are on wikipedia to just edit one article, or one group of closely related articles. Because of you username and the fact that you focus only on Imelda Marcos related articles, people automatically are skeptical of your edits. I suggest that it might be a good idea to change your user name into something that is related to Imelda Marcos, and try to stay away from her articles. There are millions of articles available to edit on wikipedia, why not choose one that you don't have an emotional or personal connection with?

Feel free to discuss any of the above three points. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

The edits were sourced.
 * She was reelected.




 * Productions in the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco and the Seattle Repertory Theater were held during the 2016-17 season.

Imeldific (talk) 08:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Muffled Pocketed  22:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Imelda Marcos
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pincrete (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Electoral history of Imelda Marcos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electoral history of Imelda Marcos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Electoral history of Imelda Marcos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pincrete (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Imelda Marcos. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  10:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * This is just to let you know that you are, in my opinion, over using the 'thanks' button in relation to me, and it is verging on harassment. If you 'thank' me once more where I consider it unsuitable, I will request Administrator intervention. Many thanks, Muffled Pocketed  16:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment from the Peanut Gallery
Hi, Imeldific. I would suggest you slow your roll on Imelda Marcos and only make edits directly suggested by the FA reviewers. Cheers! 04:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

GAR
Imelda Marcos, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — howcheng  {chat} 03:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2022
Can you explain why you blanked the Imelda Marcos article? 86.187.167.46 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

 * Administrators' noticeboard. Imeldific (talk) 23:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)