User talk:Imhungry4444

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flash (Barry Allen), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=471173014 here]. Glacialfox (talk) 17:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

WT:MMA
I think you might like to have a look at the outcome of the RfC on flags in MMA articles here. Can you please remove the ones you have added to UFC on FX: Sotiropoulos vs. Pearson. Mt king (edits) 02:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

UFC 158
Can you please elaborate on what lasting effect and significance this event has or consider a redirect to List of UFC events until there is one. Mt king (edits) 04:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi I'm from Brazil
I want to know how to get a license to get the ufc posters and put in wikipedia.

Sorry my english is bad, I used the google translator.

contact Mulekão. —Preceding undated comment added 17:31, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

What are you on about?
Who's an MMA reporter? Lukejordan02 (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I wasn't referring to you though I was referring to the edit before yours https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/174.19.6.83 He has been vandalising many a pages to do with UFC. Lukejordan02 (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about any misunderstanding but I've be reverting that IP address for an hour or so they changed the Jon Jones vs. Glover Teixeira match from UFC 172 to Jon Jones vs Chuck Liddell plus many more, it appears the fighter you have changed has pulled out due to an injury, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Various UFC pages
Hi various upcoming UFC Pages keep getting vandalised by various IP addresses is their anything we can do to stop it? Lukejordan02 (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Opinion wanted
Hi, can you please provide your opinion at Talk:UFC on Fox: Lawler vs. Brown, many thanks. Lukejordan02 (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Pre-sale poster
Just saw the poster on UFC's Twitter. My apologies. WWE Batman131 (talk) 03:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

UFC 184 Posters
I won't nominate your uploads for deletion, as long as you can tell me where you got them from. Because the file details say the use of Adobe Photoshop was involved. If you made these posters, they'll be deleted without a doubt. As well, your "Updated" poster had an odd image proportion, very different from past UFC posters. And your "Official" poster had a black line cropped out from the bottom of the image. I'll let you explain yourself and where you got the posters from, because known reverse image search tools state that they are custom made and not found anywhere else. And I'd appreciate it if instead of creating new files that you would upload new versions of previous files to avoid notices and speedy deletions due to redundancy. WWE Batman131 (talk) 18:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The exact link would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Poster trouble
Hey man. In the future, if there's a new poster could you upload it as a new version of a file that has already been created. You just uploaded a new poster for UFC Poland. Now I'm going to recieve a notice from someone and I'll have to place a deletion tag on my previous one. It's really just a pain in the you know what. If you look at the Bigfoot-Mir poster, I uploaded a new version of the file to avoid giving you any trouble. If you could do the same for me, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Poster issue
Hey man, what's the point of being stubborn? If there's a difference with a previous event poster, then change it (as you've done in the past). But this time, you can clearly see that UFC 189 started a new style of posters for events and yet, you deny that by constantly reverting. I stated that at first, it was your right to disagree but with a video source from the UFC on fight week, only days before the event... Do you deny that? Plenty of time the UFC does not update things as posters in their own media, most of the time the first poster images we have are from Combate. But the posters handled from fight week are obviously the official ones. I don't see the point of denying that, honestly. I don't wanna enter a edit war here, but I believe I'm right about everything in this particular case. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Listen, you're clearly new to this. Styles don't mean anything. The hungry one and I have always gone by the finalized UFC.TV poster as it only makes sense. Please stop trying to cause conflict! WWE Batman131 (talk) 03:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks for replying Imhung... Ops, look who's here uninvited! Then you're wrong in this situation too. I'm waiting for a response by this user, if he intends to. If you reply here, don't expect my answer WWE boy. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 04:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * He'd say the same thing. Your arguments are wrong as the TUF Finale poster didn't follow suit with your "style". I'm not the one stalking here. I can bring up at least 4 million occasions where you've sent me a talk page message expressing something you didn't like. You argue with everyone. Me, Hungry, at least a dozen Brazilians from the soccer articles, and plenty more. And I'm the one with the personal attacks? Oh, please. Anytime we discuss something you always display ageism. So back up, boy. WWE Batman131 (talk) 04:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Beneil Dariush	vs.	Mairbek Taisumov
I told this fight will take place! and you removed the silly boy :D Ricco Baroni (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

UFC 193
This is nominated for In the News. If you want the match featured in the Main Page, please let us insert the summary (prose) of the match. Discuss this at Talk:UFC 193 or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. --George Ho (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! George Ho (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I would just like to ask if you are going to be participating in the DRN mediation case for the UFC 193 article. Participation is voluntary, but it would be helpful to have an indication that you are either: a) not going to participate, b) reserve the right to participate, but do not currently wish to, or c) you currently wish to participate. Remember to keep the discussion focused on content, not editors, if you decide to participate. Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Removal of content
Hi. Regarding this edit, I just wanted to inform you that it's not acceptable to remove sourced content without citing a Wikipedia policy. The "Fighting style" or "Playing style" section appears in plenty of articles about professional athletes. Also, "What genius wrote this?" is unnecessary and inapprorpiate as well. Thank you. -- James26 (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

UFC 198
You argue I'm wrong when I prove I'm right. Report me, and yet page still stays as I have edited it. I was correct, you were wrong. Sdpdude9 (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC 155 JDS Cain.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UFC 155 JDS Cain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bellator 120 official event poster.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bellator 120 official event poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)