User talk:Immanuel Giel

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at New user log.

-- utcursch | talk to me

You can come find me on instant messenger. My info is on the bottom left of www.kisa.ca --Sonjaaa June 28, 2005 17:00 (UTC)

List of chemical element name etymologies
Hi Immanuel Giel, I saw the list of chemical element name etymologies, and I must say, I'm impressed. You've put some great information on there. This could be a great featured list candidate, but first, you will need to add some references, and even if you don't want to apply for featured list status, it would be really helpful if you cite your sources. The individual element articles have some references on there to help you get started. Thanks! --Spangineeres (háblame)  15:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:FIFAmembers.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:FIFAmembers.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Philc T+C 21:07, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Let it be. --Immanuel Giel 11:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Carthago delenda est
Hi. I've reverted your edit, as you've linked to a non-existent category. --Dweller 13:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fischy Music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  21:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Game (dice game)
I have nominated The Game (dice game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Game (dice game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 16:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Kangxi radicals
Hi, can you help finish up the 200 or so Kangxi radical red links in Template:Kangxi Radicals? Cheers! bd2412 T 05:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Gnothi sauton.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gnothi sauton.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Herr Giel, in einer Wahlbroschüre der JU Germersheim habe ich die Abbildung des von sowohl in künstlerischer Gestaltung und handwerklicher Ausführung von mir geschaffene Kreiselskulptur festgestellt. Darin wir als Quelle Immanuel Giel 2012, CCBY-SA angegeben. Ich möchte mit Nachdruck daraufhin weisen, dass nur ich die Urheberrechte der Kreiselskulptur besitze. Das Gesamtwerk habe ich der Gemeinde Neupotz als Leihgabe zur Verfügung gestellt, bleibt aber weiterhin in meinem Besitz. In Wikimedia Commons ist der Beschreibung der Kreiselabbildung zu entnehmen: Quelle - Eigenes Werk Urheber - Immanuel Giel Lizenz - "Ich der Urheber dieses Werkes, veröffentlichen es unter folgender Lizenz u.a. zu folgenden Bedingungen: Namensnennung usw. Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen Daraus entsteht der Eindruck, dass Sie der Urheber der Kreiselskulptur seien.

Auch wenn die Kreiselablichtung unter den dort angegebenen Lizenzbedingungen von anderen genutzt werden kann, wurden meine Rechte nicht berücksichtigt. Zumindest hätte in den Quellenangaben die tatsächlichen Urheberrechte der Kreiselskulptur genannt werden müssen. Da dies nicht erfolgte, haben Sie meine Urheberrechte verletzt.

Die Kreiselskulptur ist zwar in öffentlichem Raum platziert und kann zu privaten Zecken auch abgelichtet werden. Allerdings mit der Einschränkung, dass die Ablichtungen nicht für gewerbliche Nutzung oder Werbung jeglicher Art genutzt werden darf. Dies wurde auch bei der Leihgabe-Vertragsgestaltung mit der Gemeinde Neupotz so vereinbart. Lediglich die Gemeinde Neupotz darf Ablichtungen zu Werbezwecken innerhalb der Gemeinde nutzen.

Ich bitte um Stellungnahme und Regelung bezw. Vereinbarung der weiteren Vorgehensweise.

Gerfried Sand Birkenring 10 76777 Neupotz Tel 07272-8475 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.227.167.190 (talk) 23:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Winged word
Hi. I just noticed you created an article on the winged word back in 2007. It's grown quite a bit. Are there any good sources that would support the existence of this term and article? Viriditas (talk) 04:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Winged word for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winged word is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Winged word until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Korny O&#39;Near (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Cassiopium
Hello Immanuel, great to see that you've been around for such a long time! I just read List of chemical elements naming controversies and stumbled over the statement "some German chemists still use cassiopium instead of lutetium", which I have a hard time believing, and thus marked with cn. Further research showed that it ultimately came from you, from this edit, which gives it more credibility for me. Would you have a source for it? &mdash; Sebastian 22:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The name Cassiopeium (Cp) proposed by Carl Auer von Welsbach in the early 20 century was used until 1949 among German scientists, but is no longer in use. Does this bit of information help you? --Immanuel Giel (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does, thank you. So I removed the half sentence. That Germans until the end of WW2 would stubbornly hold on to their own name is no big news, and the fact that some might have still have used that innocuous name a few years after is hardly encyclopedic. If you disagree and have a source for the exact year, I'd suggest a better place would be in the preceding paragraph, where both Auer von Welsbach and Cassiopeium are mentioned. &mdash; Sebastian 16:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral symbol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lotos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)