User talk:Immasureda

I think we resolved this via IRC. If not, please re-add the help me tag and ask a question. Huon (talk) 20:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramon Gener Sala


The article Ramon Gener Sala has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 23:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ramon Gener Sala, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ramon Gener Sala, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 23:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Ramon Gener Sala. Melcous (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

First of all Sirs, I did use references, but it seems they are not accepted and they mysteriously disappear ... All the information I used in my first attempt was from the same article in the Catalan Wikipedia and that articles does not have any review or any comment or nothing... So I do not understand why you don't accept exactly the same in English Could you use the same rules? It would be very useful... I just try to arrange the "error" of the article but it seems is never enough... (Immasureda (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)).

I have added the categories, but any of them exist, the only one existing currently is the "opera". I've been looking for information in internet trying to find verifiable information and I've added some new webs. Maybe there are others, but really, I haven't been able to find any other. I will appreciate that you reconsider some of the multiple issues added to the article initially. I do try to improve always my articles and I do not feel ofended, what I feel is mistreatment and lack of coherence and balance between the way some articles are reviewed. I've found many others which are very badly written and not verified at all, however, and no-one has added to them any tags as you did with mine. So I will appreciate you dedicate your efforts to others, they will for sure appreciate it. Many thanks. (Immasureda (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)).