User talk:Immersion100

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Lorna Fitzgerald appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Philippe 21:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Lorna Fitzgerald.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Theres no need for that

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Blanking others' user talk pages is very disruptive (and is also considered vandalism). In addition,, , , and (adding your own biased opinion) does not in any way, shape or form make the encyclopedia any more accurate, and you edit-warred to keep said information in there on top of that! After being warned not to add that again, you do and engage in blatant vandalism. C'Mon Man! –MuZemike 22:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I think what happened here may have been a bit of an over-reaction. While the page-blanking was entirely unacceptable, I am willing to assume good faith that your initial edits were not intended as vandalism. Unfortunately, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, opinions such as the ones you were trying to insert into the article really don't belong here. Information in our articles needs to be able to be backed up with reliable sources, and neutral in tone. It's for this reason your edits were removed. Had someone explained this in the first place, we probably wouldn't be here now. I am willing to unblock you, however I'd first like your commitment that you try to read through some of our core policies, and your commitment to approach an editor and discuss with them should any of your future edits be reverted, before attempting to put your edits back in. Would you be willing to do this for me? Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes I would. And in future I would try and source information and include it only if relevant/approriate Immersion100 (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * This user is a sockpuppet of User:Ln of x and should not be unblocked. anemoneprojectors   talk  22:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)