User talk:Immigrant laborer

Welcome to Wikipedia
As your username suggests, as well as your edits, there'll be a lot of work for you on Wikipedia, as i'm sure hundreds if not thousands of articles use immigration in place of emigration. If you have any questions or need help, ask me on my talk page or contact other users.  Adotchar | reply here 21:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Aircraft?
Is there a reference for aircraft in museums being past tense? I suppose since you can't run an airplane in a museum, but you can run a computer, there is a significant difference. In general, events, such as the design or production of a computer (or other device) are past tense, but for non-events they are present. In the case of computers, it is present as soon as the documentation is written, even before a working model is produced, and as long as the documentation still exists, or longer. It isn't so obvious that it would be different for aircraft. Thanks, Gah4 (talk) 00:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * WikiProject_Aviation/Style_guide/Layout_(Aircraft) says "The first sentence should be in present tense if flyable aircraft exist. But if the aircraft is extinct or only found in museums then use past tense.". I'm pretty sure no version of a 704 is close to operable.  The logistics of providing power to it are one big reason and the likelihood of all those irreplaceable parts that have been sitting on a shelf for 40-50 years "just working" (0.0001%) is another. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 00:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * If it can be made to run, LCM will do it. But I was wondering about an outside source for the past tense for airplane museums.  Maybe unlike airplanes, computers are defined by their documentation.  Not, for example, that IBM S/360 is not a computer, but a computer architecture.  A plan for how to build computers.  But also, the Boeing 747 is not an airplane, but a family of airplanes, with specific models that may or may not exist anymore. Gah4 (talk) 03:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm consciously avoiding any sort of policy discussions on wikipedia and sticking to a personal no-reverts, ever rule, so I'd suggest that some coordination between the working groups might be a good idea here. Beyond that, I'm out. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I mostly stay away from policy discussions, but don't specifically try to avoid them. I do still wonder, though, if there is an outside of wikipedia source for museum airplanes being past tense. I first got into this tense discussion reading about the PDP-10 in past tense while sitting next to one that was running. As above, it is easier to run a computer in a museum than an airplane. Though there is: Flying_Heritage_%26_Combat_Armor_Museum. Gah4 (talk) 21:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve What the Hell Did I Just Read
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Immigrant laborer, thanks for creating What the Hell Did I Just Read!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve the page, if possible. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 06:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for TOPCAT (software)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of TOPCAT (software). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ( Deletion review/Log/2019 November 2 ) Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Breakout vs. Brick Out
Just a note on an edit in the Integer BASIC article - the original 1976 source is definitely "BREAKOUT" as you can see in the original manual (linked). "BRICK OUT" appears in a 1979 version by Tog, but I'm not sure that's the first.. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Ambassador (Israeli TV series) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to The Ambassador (Israeli TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ambassador (Israeli TV series) (July 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Ambassador (Israeli TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Ambassador_(Israeli_TV_series) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SafariScribe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Ambassador_(Israeli_TV_series) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 06:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)