User talk:ImmortalTruthIII

Your discussion
Greetings @ImmortalTruthIII


 * With reference to  in my user space though is titled as 'friendly', devoid of any greetings, in breach of WP:Goodfaith, is banking on uninformed and misplaced personalized aspersions  and whataboutism.
 * User sandboxes are incomplete places not places of discussion  nor one is supposed to draw conclusions from what is written in sandbox because such writings can be incomplete.
 * I am just a student of South Asian studies beyond that I have not shared any other personal information and you are not expected to draw personal inferences.  One is not expected to infer and discuss user's personal identities unless particularly shared, that amounts to breach of Wikipedia policies.
 * While caring about women's rights one can see instances where in I have pointed out exaggerations made for smear purposes and helped Wikipedia community avoid those.
 * Though I do have progressive POVs towards skepticism and women's rights, for your kind information, to best of myself I respect and maintain reasonable editorial neutrality as a responsible member of Wikipedia community. I have written on women's rights in global perspectives then I have touched on US, France, India too and not just Pakistan.
 * Problems in other countries do not absolve problems in Pakistan and are not supposed to be censored where credible sources are available and deserves due weight. Your whataboutism is very much uninformed and misplaced.
 * In any case, in good faith, I noted reference links in your message @ Talk:Rape in India and placed article improvement request @ India discussion board taking your references into account.
 * Also added Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Romance
 * You are most welcome to take up any women's rights and human rights issues of any country add credibly sourceable content in relevant articles on your own as per Wikipedia policies and not move around accusing and hounding other users.
 * We shall discuss Tourism in Pakistan related content issues, if any, at talk page of that article without whataboutism.

Thanks for understanding and cooperation in positive anticipation.

Warm regards

&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias &#61; expanding information &#38; knowledge&#39; (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)