User talk:Imogen31

Hi there, first of all Wikipedia is wonderful, well done! I am a bit concerned that the information is factual, when I looked up Droppin Well Bomb I noticed there was a part saying the building was of poor construction leading to deaths. I have a report saying the exact opposite that because of the generous use of steel in the building, many lives were saved. I edited the page but was amazed to find it had been changed hours later.

I think in historical matters such as this, independent factual reports should be the preferred source.

What is the procedure if an edit is basically libellous?

All the best, Christine

In violence we forget who we are. ~Mary McCarthy 20:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Christine. You're better raising matters like this on the article's talk page, ie Talk:Droppin Well bombing. What is the source/report you have for the steel construction? Stu   ’Bout ye!  15:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 16:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)