User talk:Impala2009/July 2009

The WPVG Newsletter (Q2 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  15:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mr. Klutz is Nuts book cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mr. Klutz is Nuts book cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 16:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Simon Langham
You reverted an entry I made to the Talk page "Simon Langham". My computer skills are few, and I have difficulty operating Wikipedia; I never delete any text other than my own, and wanted to replace a passage I had pasted. As I have no copy, could you please replace this entry?Colcestrian (talk) 02:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm not Impala2009, but I saw your request and decided to complete it. Please see Talk:Simon Langham for your comment, which has been added back. I hope that was what you wanted; please tell me if I made a mistake. Thanks, The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 05:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Colcestrian said on his talk page that's not what he wanted. Well, I don't know what he wanted. Maybe the solution is to try to understand what he is staying. Impala2009 | Talk 00:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

ACC tool
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Unfortunately I was unable to process your request. The ACC tool is a powerful program, and at the present time your account is either too new for us to determine whether you would know how to properly use the tool or that you have not attained the necessary level of trust to be granted access. Please don't take this personally and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Fun Pika  00:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Users' talk pages
It appears you have been in a conflict with about them removing comments from their talk page. I'm writing to make you aware that users (including anonymous IP editors) are allowed to remove warnings and comments from their talk pages. Doing so is considered acknowledgment of having read them. Restoring warnings and comments to other users' talk pages after they have removed them is considered disruption. There are important exceptions to this: I hope this clears things up. Toddst1 (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Editors are not allowed to remove declined requests before the block expires
 * Editors are not allowed to remove information about shared IP addresses, such as
 * Editors are not allowed to removed confirmed or confirmed  tags from their talk pages.

Chess Game
Yes WimpyKid  ( talk  *  sandbox ) 18:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Impala2009. I just to let you know that this chess game is for you and me. Please make a move it is your turn. WimpyKid ( talk  *  sandbox ) 18:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Talk page revert
The vandals are busy tonight! Bad news for them, so are we! Newportm (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My thanks to you too! thanks for catching some of the vandalism thrown my way Ottawa4ever (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

A late thank you
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Darren23 (Contribs) 20:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks


WimpyKid ( talk  *  sandbox ) has eaten your cookie! The cookie made happy and 'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

WimpyKid ( talk  *  sandbox ) 03:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) Grutness...wha?  01:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Chess
Please make a move in my chess game? WimpyKid ( talk  *  sandbox ) 02:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert
Saw the vandalism to my User Page on my screen but was right in the middle of something. - Jeffrey Mall  |  Talk2Me  |  BNosey  - 14:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
The Earwig (Talk &#124; Contribs) 15:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I have read it. Thank for leaving that important note. Probably after you actually accept for real, I should create it. Sorry, Chevy   Impala   2009  05:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Harley's the man
User has already had a level 3 warning see here. - Jeffrey Mall  |  Talk2Me  |  BNosey  - 00:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, user was reported. - Jeffrey Mall  |  Talk2Me  |  BNosey  - 00:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Paradise Daytona Beach
I don't think you should have reverted this edit of User:Paradise Daytona Beach on the talk page Talk:Bill Frist. This user was trying to make a genuine enquiry about changes in article space after being given a 3RR warning for edit warring. He did put his comment in the wrong place, and did not sign it, but that is no reason to revert. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 01:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

False Positive Warning Message
I believe that you gave me a warning message when I didn't make any unconstructive edits. I was just putting the article for speedy deletion because the article both had no notability and it's an attack page. -- 科学高爾夫迷 01:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The reason I blanked the article was because it tells you to blank the article so it only contains the deletion template, according to here. Template:Db-g10 Thanks, -- 科学高爾夫迷 02:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean, but since the template is based on an attack page, the content is supposed to be blanked so other people don't see the disparaging content in the page. And if the article is originally blank, a filter would be triggered to disallow the article to be published. Hope that helps. -- 科学高爾夫迷 02:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Illegal Move?
Is | 4... F4 a legal chess move? Doesn't seem like it. Pawns can't move three squares in one go! 18:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL ... I didn't even look at the move history to notice that. The pawn must have superpowers! ;)  --B (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That pawn had more than superpowers, it could have lost white the game!     20:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

thesevenseas     18:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

ANI thread
Hi, I have started a discussion at WP:ANI about the disruption at History of terrorism that you may be involved in. Quantpole (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Lute88
Would you kindly explain your reasons for reporting User:Lute88 for vandalism? His edits to Ave Maria (Caccini) are perfectly legitimate - he added Russian language sources for the information in the article. He described them as such, too, and used the right formatting for references. What exactly is the problem, and why was it necessary to revert his edits and report him as a vandal, rather than request a translation? --Jashiin (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding a reference, whatever language it is in, is NOT vandalism. Simply reverting it is NOT the way to deal with it, and reporting a content-editor who adds references as a vandal is, to put it extremely mildly, assuming bad faith. You should've asked for a translation, or at least revert AND ask for a translation in your edit summary. --Jashiin (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your actions with this user were less than stellar. I would be interested in an explanation of how adding a source to an article is vandalism. Your actions were also damaging, since you managed to get him blocked. On reviewing the situation, had I been the admin handling your request, I would have been more likely to block you for removing good faith contributions without discussion. Please mind that behavior in the future. -- Andy Walsh  (talk)  17:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Illegal Move!!
The pawn can't take the queen. It's pinned by the bishop on C5! 18:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And to answer your question, Impala2009, no, I'm not an alcoholic. That's actually extremely offensive.  I don't drink at all because I don't believe in mind-altering substances.  There is nothing whatsoever good that can come from it and the ills that can come from alcohol can be disastrous.  When I was young, I lost a good friend to a drunk driving incident.  As I said in the comment, your only legal move of was KH1 because the pawn is pinned by the bishop.  The world's following move would have been QxH4+.  Then if KG1, then QG3, KH1, BxF2.  If KG2, then NF6. --B (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)