User talk:Imperialgermanbayonets

August 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dreyse needle gun have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dreyse needle gun. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dreyse needle gun was changed by Imperialgermanbayonets (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877336 on 2018-08-18T16:17:07+00:00.

October 2018
You are claiming that some of the Dreyse needle gun are of different models than stated by the captions. Please can you use the article talk page to explain this clearly. It would help if you made reference to some reliable sources so that people can check.

At present you have been repeatedly reverting or undoing reverts made by others at Dreyse needle gun. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page, as you have been asked to.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)