User talk:Imperium13

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Although draft space gives a measure of protection with regard to notability and referencing, it must still follow our rules with regard to, for example, copyright violation and advertising. I deleted your article because
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Some of your references were in fact just spamlinks to his companies, in one case (Park Avenue) not even mentioning him
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. that's particularly the case when they are spamlinks.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Cox specialises in the acquisition of small to medium size enterprises with established brands that he identifies as having potential for re-engineering and growth. He is a “hands on” operator assuming the role of Chief Executive Officer in all of his businesses... today boasts a diversified portfolio of businesses operating in luxury accommodation... This fulfilled a long held ambition to own a boutique brewery...

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Several of your references were clearly not independent third-party sources
 * He may be notable, but a lot of this, as the editor who nominated for deletion said, is just LinkedIn stuff, Sarah is a member of the school’s Rowing Committee... Andrew enjoys a round of golf...
 * You have a conflict of interest when editing this article, and you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * You are editing with a name affiliate with a company, which is not permitted. conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization, directly or indirectly, to use Wikipedia to promote their interests is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   .
 * I am going to block this account because the user name is not permitted. If you get an account with an acceptable user name, contact me again then to see about restoring the deleted text. There's no point doing so while you are blocked

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Imperium13, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Jimflbeak for the feedback. I will edit accordingly if you could please restore the deleted text. Request to unblock and use my new username Aosterga

Imperium13 (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC) The Aosterga account was recently registered. Was that you? If so, you could just continue using that account and abandon this account. PhilKnight (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes that was me - I will switch. Thanks Imperium13 (talk) 05:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)