User talk:Impetus SandStorm

Speedy deletion nomination of Impetus Sandstorm
A tag has been placed on Impetus Sandstorm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Impetus SandStorm


A tag has been placed on User:Impetus SandStorm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of User:Impetus SandStorm and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MuffledThud (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Impetus SandStorm, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MuffledThud (talk) 10:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Intellicus Technologies. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  10:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Impetus Sandstorm. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bradjamesbrown is travelling (Talk to my master) 10:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Impetus Sandstorm.  Anna Lincoln  10:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)