User talk:ImpishGrin

Hello,

you have been editing "for improvement" Olczyk's reference in the Bizzarrini article.

I wonder if: 1) a book that doesn't exist can be considered a valid source. Even if it's eventually released, it will need to be subject to a critical review before being considered as a valid source. 2) it is appropriate to direct a link toward a commercial site, whose contents are, to say the least, controversial and whose tone is more than rude when dealing with other people.

It seems to me that cancelling the two references would be the best job for the quality of this article, leaving as reference only non controversial material.

Best

BizzaGT